New Referendum Proposed ... Told you so!!!

A much more humbled Minister Dick Roche tried to pour oil on the tumultuous waters he had stirred up in his blasphemous suggestion that the Irish government should ignore the will of the Irish people in favor of placating the European master race in an interview on RTE this morning. However, in his attempt to make peace, he only made matters worse for himself.

I agree wholeheartedly with Cardinal Brady's assessment that we don't believe the Euros have any religious convictions to back their rush to power. Of course they don't! What glory could Christ's Church possibly get from the fourth Reich? The power hungry would-be masters on the continent are in it for themselves alone ... as before. Hitler, too, believed he was acting on divine assignment, but who would accept that assertion now, with the perspective of history?

The same will be seen of this power grab in the future. If Ireland falls into goose stepping line with the Euros, we will be blithely handing our leash into the hands of another brit-like master who will strip our goods from us and leave us wallowing in the mud left behind.

Let's look at some of Roach's comments on RTE today:

Roche referred to the influence on the outcome of the referendum by "people outside Europe who wish Europe harm" - By which he means the Irish diaspora who have a clearer perspective of the overall issue. Indeed, in Roach's opinion, what right do Irish descendants have to state their experience and feelings about their - our - homeland?

At one point, Roche actually said; "we've already had a referendum on this matter." yes, we have, and we told our feelings - don't try to shove us around, thank you!

Questioned repeatedly, Roche continually refused to say that other cabinet members agreed to the idea of defying what the Irish people have said. This can offer a modicum of hope that Roach, alone, is defying the people's wishes.

Roche referred several times to "Eukips and ultra extremists" as those who are arguing against a second referendum. We can only assume that these biased terms of endearment mean anyone who disagrees with Roach, who wants to be more Euro than Irish.

Roche also hinted at threats that Ireland will find herself in much more difficult economic straits if we do not submit ourselves to the master race in Europe prime. These sound frighteningly like old, historic sabre-rattlings which Ireland has often had to deal with, don't they?

Just to show his knowledge of what has happened in the last few months, Roche said, "The Irish people have spoken." To which we say, yes, so let us be!

And he fell to the simplistic arguments that opposing sides to Lisbon were liars, that "everybody" on the no side argued that Ireland's place was within Europe - nope, wrong again, Mr. Roach. Many of us argued that Ireland's place was with Ireland. Perhaps with some help from our plantation lands in the USA.

Oh, and by the way, Mr. Roche, twenty-six other European "states" did not agree to the treaty as you assert. Many of those "states", including France, have serious problems with allowing themselves to be blended complacently into a whole which reflects none of their national identity. As I've said before, Greece is not part of Spain; France is still not part of Germany, and Ireland is not part of any of them! We are Ireland! Not "Number Twenty-Seven" among a bunch of nameless, faceless, identical "states."

I understand. I really do. Everyone in Europe is so jealous of America's success they can't wait to be called The United States of Europe. But, as an American for 50 years let me say that the homogeneity here is not what you want. Yes, we have some funny little "Yankee" and "Southerner" variances in our culture, but California is very much like New York is very much like Florida is very much like Chicago. We are all the same.

There is no way that the French people will quietly go into the blender with the Germans, the Italians, the Polish, and the british. The historic characters are too firmly ingrained into the national cultures. And they should be! The world needs a uniquely French, Greek, Polish, and IRISH character to relate to. This rush to a one-world identity is wrong. It is not efficient, it is not sensible, it is wrong.

Ireland, please stand strong against the pressure to melt into a euro-character. The world has one melting pot. It is moderately successful in some areas, but not in all. You don't want to surrender your Celtic character which is only yours. Stand strong.

Ireland is Ireland!

More reasons to stop eating dead things!

This comes from a friend of mine - funny thing is she's a carnivore and would probably eat some of these disgusting things!

This is a popular buffet at the Beijing Olympic village ...




"Oh yes, dog brain soup very good for you! Very high in cholesterol and slimy doggy stuff!"





NOW - aren't you glad to be a vegetarian! Honestly, this looks like the depths for deprivation. How low we've stooped to eat bugs, dogs' livers, and goats' lungs! Don't give me that, "but people who are starving will eat anything to stay alive." People who are starving will eat plants and gain much more food value than from scorpions and snake. Besides, China is rapidly becoming an economic powerhouse.

This is just depravity. We were created as a beautiful, dignified, happy race. But after the Fall, we have tried to see how low we can go. And this is pretty low!

God forgive us!

Welcommen to the real EU!

HA! The Daily Telegraph posted a story yesterday that demonstrates the real mindset inside the European unUnion. The story, titled "British children banned from German only playground in Crete resort" tells that a Greek resort which restricts its children's facilities to only German visitors.

"British families spent thousands of pounds each to book into the family friendly Meltemi Village, an all inclusive resort on the island of Crete. But when they arrived at the so-called family friendly resort they were told that the children's club was out of bounds because it was for German youngsters only," goes the story.

Well, of course, because the Germans are, remember, the master race, so why shouldn't their kindern receive special privileges?

But who is really surprised? This idea to blend such historically divided cultures into one happy family is as goofy as it sounds on the surface. Yes, individuals can get along. Yes, some cultures can even manage to cooperate for a profit. But face it, you can only go so far into making the Irish act like the French, or the brits act like the Czechs, or the Germans act like ... well, like anything but Germans!

The only ones to profit from the solidification of the EU compact will be the highhanded cliques such as the Germans and the French. This attempt to replay WWII again by taking over Europe is a blatant power grab. Have the Irish benefited from the union? A little. But so does the mouse when he accepts the first bite of cheese in the trap. Or the child who receives a free drug from a kindly pusher.

Der Herrenmensch are just part of the problematic mindset of this unnatural union. Our culture developed as a slave race to the brits (who thought themselves the master race), not as a partner of the broader Europe peoples. Yes, our contributions to those folk helped them develop their cultures and civilization, but how much did they help us overall? How much did they contribute to the Irish character (rape aside)? How much did they help us out of our servitude to our tormentors for 700 years? Not at all. They just looked on as we were trampled and misused by a stronger group. And, because that stronger group used our resources to buy the Europeans' loyalty, they refused to even see our slavery as wrong. They were, in fact, partners to our subjugation.

So why should we join them in their mass hysteria? This whole European Union farce is an attempt to build, not only an unnatural, but an unholy alliance. Doesn't this sound a little familiar? Doesn't this ring of a rebuilding of the old Roman Empire, as foretold in the Bible? Ezekiel 38 and 39, as well as references in Daniel and Revelation tell that in the last days the Roman Empire will be rebuilt from a union of her neighbors.

My dear Irish brothers and sisters, do we really want to become part of that? Not if we read the whole story and see where that group proceeds.

For more on the development of the EU into a 2,500 year old prophecy, read Joel Rosenberg's blog at joelrosenberg.blogspot.com.

Don't go blindly into another damaging relationship with the same folk who have scorned us for so long. Their disdain is apparent in their disregard for our recent vote on Lisbon. We have more strength of character than they ever have had. We've earned it in our chains. Push them away.

Americans Refused Voting Rights

In a story by Robert Novak, published today, we learn that,

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Rep. Roy Blunt, the House Republican whip, on July 8 introduced a resolution demanding that the Defense Department better enable U.S. military personnel overseas to vote in the November elections. That act was followed by silence. Democrats normally leap on an opportunity to find fault with the Bush Pentagon. But not a single Democrat joined Blunt as a co-sponsor, and an all-Republican proposal cannot pass in the Democratic-controlled House.

So? Republican proposes, Democrats decline to support.

But wait, why wouldn't Democrat Congressmen want American soldiers to miss out on their right to vote for president?

Could it be because so many loyal Americans who feel strongly enough about defending our rights they'll go overseas to risk life and limb ... would be opposed to an ARAB-American as their Commander in Chief? Or maybe it's just because there aren't too many Democrats fighting for us as there are Republicans?

Ooooo! How diabolically clever! Isolate the citizens most likely to vote against your party during the elections so your party will be in a stronger position to win. Sounds like somebody has been taking notes form Robert Mugabe's political tactics!

Write your congressman and ask them to push for voting rights for American soldiers. At least give them a chance to vote on the government they're defending!

Barack Hussein is ARAB-American

For some reason (oh come on, I'm trying to be nice) the US media has glommed onto Barack Hussein and are infatuated with him. The tout his looks, his charisma, his popularity at his rock concert-style appearances, but for some reason ( ! ) they don't talk too much about his experience, knowledge of the issues, or plans for our future if he should (shudder) become pres ... you know, I can't bear to say it.

I won't wear you down by pointing out that the reason the media focuses on his surface, but doesn't dwell too much on his lack of depth. I'll only guess there's not much story fodder there. But I do want to point out one important point about which BHO has made a big deal and which the media has followed the pattern - that is his ethnicity. Osama, er, sorry Obama refers to his background regularly, referring to his upbringing and his family history. But, once again, much of it is style, but no substance.

A recent visit to an ancestry site which has explored Barack Hussein's ancestry (and many have done so) reveals the following statement regarding BHO:

"Senator Obama is not African American according to U.S. Law. Senator Obama is an Arab-American according to U.S. Law. Senator Obama’s racial background consists of the following: 50% white (mother and her parents on both sides), 43.25% Arabic (father and his parents on both sides), and 6.25% African Negro (father on one side, but 1 generation removed). 12.5% is the legal threshold one must prove to claim racial status under the law. " [emphasis mine]

So, by law, Barack Hussein Obama is not African-American, as he claims. Maybe this is why so many real African-Americans are turning away from a politician who is trying to "play the race card" and to take advantage of their difficulties to ride to office.

Do we even need to examine the eligibility of a presidential candidate who blatantly lies about such a basic issue as his family? Yes, we've become inured to our politicians lying from time to time - good grief, it's become almost expected of that particular species - but a presidential candidate should have some integrity, for Heaven's sake! We're talking about someone who could be entrusted with our national safety, much less representing us to the world!

The man doesn't even know where he came from, how can he know where he's going?

This Arab was ashamed of his family as a kid (changed his name in school to Barry) and tried to say he was African-American rather than Arabian. But he can't really make a logical claim to an African American work. First, he wasn't raised as an African American, and he wasn't raised by African Americans, and he wasn't raised in an African American neighborhood.

So this Arab is trying to ride the coattails of American blacks who have honest issues of their ancestral past to deal with.

The media shouldn't be wasting their time wondering editorially whether Barack Hussein will carry the black vote, they should be poling Islamic temples to see if he will carry the Arabian vote. Wait, do they vote? Bet they will if there's a chance of having a "brother" Arab in the White House deciding American policy with the Middle East!

GACK! Did you hear what I just said? "a chance of having an Arab in the White House deciding American policy with the Middle East!" Where will Israel stand at that point in our considerations? Where will our energy concerns stand if B. Hussein is presi ... nope, still can't say it.

Please, inform as many others as you possibly can of this possible situation. Tell them we're considering an Arab for president. And urge them to vote against him.